2 Gang Saturn Wireless Issue

Discussion in 'C-Bus Toolkit and C-Gate Software' started by Duncan, Feb 3, 2005.

  1. Duncan

    Duncan

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Salinas de Garci Mendoza, Bolivia
    Hi John,

    When you scan the network do you see this Unit in the list or does it show up as "Error - failed to scan"?
     
    Duncan, Feb 3, 2005
    #1
  2. Duncan

    John Harnett

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Melbourne
    It usually shows up, once or twice I got the 'Failed to scan' but usually it shows up with a reasonable description (ie Saturn switch) but when I click on it for more info (or to add it to the database) the toolkit reports that it does not have the details of the unit and I need to update the software. When it does find it the Serial No. field is 'N/A'. Also it seems to have a great deal of trouble finding it, more often than not the unit does not show up at all. Currently the wireless side of the network is reporting the gateway and a single 2 Gang plug adapter, which is odd as there are 2 relay plug adapters and 2 dimmer plug adapters but the gateway (which is sitting in the same room for testing) has a great deal of trouble seeing them. The relay units configured quite easily in learn mode but the dimmer took many attempts (don't know why), and in the end the relay units sometimes show up and the dimmersnever have (puzzling). As a stand alone the Saturn switch works a treat, great idea to make them 'drop-in' replacements. I suspect that I'm having some issues with the wireless signal tho' as looking at the gateway C-Bus Status it's showing 921 error packets, with 1393 received (don't know if the errors are counted in the 1393 or not). Also of note, 1222 transmit attempts and 1095 collisions with only 173 succesfull transmissions (which on the face of it seems rather low).

    The current wireless side is a gateway, 2relay plugs, 2 dimmer plugs and a two switch saturn plus a wireless remote. At the moment only the gateweay and one of the relay plugs is showing up in the toolkit, and it's sitting on address 255 and any attmep to shift it to a different address results in 'Unit readdress failed' '.CheckNetwork and Unit'. hen, shorlty after the toolkit dies and windows reports this and creates an error log. This is running on Windows 2000 with the toolkit install from a day or two ago.

    Any hints in this lot?

    Ta

    John
     
    John Harnett, Feb 3, 2005
    #2
  3. Duncan

    Duncan

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Salinas de Garci Mendoza, Bolivia

    Nasty, it does certainly sound like you're having communications issues with the units.. are the units installed with the C-Clip in the correct manner as described in the installation guide?

    Are you able to program the plug adaptors OK?
     
    Duncan, Feb 3, 2005
    #3
  4. Duncan

    ashleigh Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,397
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Based on the transmission stats you quoted, there seems to be excessive RF interference.

    Possible causes:

    1. You have some other equipment operating at 433.9 MHz. (Note that garage door openers usually dont run at this frequency. But some RF doorbells do. There are some wireless headphones used for streaming audio that run here, though generally these are banned at this frequency.)

    2. A big nasty interferer somewhere close by. The wireless units have a very good front end RF filter to try and knock this out, but there is an amateur radio band quite close by. We have not seen any interference before from this band but if you live next to to some guy with a 10 kW transmitter in his back yard you might be in trouble. (You might also glow at night.). Or if close to a harbour, and the US Navy is in town then you might also have trouble. :)

    3. Saturn / Neo switches with C-Clip mounted on the wrong side. The lump of metal comprising the C-Clip makes a difference to the antenna match - put it on the wrong side and there is a reduction in range.

    4. Mixing production and pre-release units. There were several changes to the communication protocol between the pre-release units that went into field trials, and the production release. In general, these changes will manifest as not communicating at all, or in some cases a lack of some function. The number of pre-release units floating around is small, and they are all marked as engineering or trial / samples. Pre-release units were not sold, and should not be sold.

    5. Creating a network in Toolkit and then downloading it to the units. This clobbers the house code in the unit, and after that they don't communicate any more. Don't do this! The next release of toolkit will fix it.

    6. Units are out of range of each other, or marginal. Depending on the building construction type, you can get a range of between about 10m and 40m. The 40m end is pretty rare - you would need a building made of rice-paper. Brick veneer should give 15m to 20m. Solid brick or stone is often less. Buildings built with ironstone can be really bad (a giveaway is if you mobile phone signal drops significantly inside the building then you know there is something absorbing lots of RF energy). Reinforced concrete contains a lot of steel which is a nice RF shield, so range there will reduce also - through 10m to 15m should generally be OK.

    If you are having severe problems, erase the units and start again. Erase is done by:

    . Enter Learn on the unit (Press & hold top 2 buttons)

    . Enter Scene setup mode (double click any button) -> indicator on that button flashes

    . Enter Erase mode (double click the same button again) -> indicators on all buttons flash

    . Press and hold the top 2 buttons (like you did to enter Learn)

    The unit will take 5 to 10 seconds to erase itself back to factory conditions.

    Once you have done that, go through the process again of training them into a network. Add one unit at a time to be sure that its performing.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 3, 2005
    ashleigh, Feb 3, 2005
    #4
  5. Duncan

    Don

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    429
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Townsville, Australia

    1) The SAW filter at the front end of the RF C-Bus units will give protection against overloading by nearby transmitters outside the band, but will give no protection for a transmitter operating within the 433MHz LIPD band (433.92MHz +/- ~2MHz)

    2) The 433MHZ LIPD band is shared with several other services. The frequency band 420-450MHz is allocated in Australia as follows:
    a) Primary Service - Radiolocation (radar, etc)
    b) Secondary Services - Fixed, Mobile
    c) Secondary Services - Amateur
    d) Secondary Services - Amateur Sattelite

    The primary service has more "rights" than other services, and is not likely to lose in any dispute about interference with other services.

    The Fixed, Mobile services used in this band are generally in the range 420MHz - 430MHz ( Sydney Olympics made this a popular band). The mobile services would be typically under 100W, and might cause problems for short periods of time. The fixed services would most likely be located at the tops of hills, and could have powers into the kW range.

    Amateur stations in Australia are limited to a maximum power of 400W delivered to the antenna, and must abide by the limitations of field strength set by the ACA in any area frequented by people (includes homes) This means that high field strengths can not be expected anywhere near an amateur station except way out of reach at the top of a tower, otherwise the station is not operating within the legal guidelines.

    Amateur Satellite stations generally have their antennas pointing upward, and rarely are these antennas mounted within buildings.


    Don
     
    Don, Feb 4, 2005
    #5
  6. Duncan

    John Harnett

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Stumped!

    Well, I've reset the wall plate back to factory, unplugged all other units, removed the batteries from the RF remote, power reset the gateway, taken the batteries out of the wireless doorbell, moved the gateway to within a couple of feet of the wall plate, deleted the wireless network from toolkit and tried again.

    Then set the gateway up onto the same 'network' as the wall plate (this took a couple of goes) and then added the wireless network in toolkit. If anything it's even worse than before! Now all it manages is 'Error - failed to scan unit' for the wall plate. The packet error rates reported by the gateway are still way too high. As an aside the wall c-clip is on the left, but as a further test I reset the wall plate and then attempted to 'learn' the gateway and a nearby plug unit (again a couple of feet). After a couple of attempts the gateway's lights reported that it had 'joined' with the plug unit. Looking via the toolkit, only the gateway unit showed up at all - so cannot be due to the wall mounting of the wall plate, as the plug units suffer from the same problem.

    There are no RF transmitters in use anywhere in the house (having de-batteried the doorbell units), the c-buss units are all within a couple of feet and still don't talk to each other. As a side issue I can get the remote to talk to the units, but it seems rather sluggish - things can take a few presses before any action - most frustrating. In suburban Glen Iris I would not expect any large RF transmitters nearby. The wireless TCP/IP seems to work rather well (different band I guess).

    Any further suggestions before I resort to rewiring a room I was planning to leave wireless? Bit hard to return the wall plate as it's been installed once.... I had hoped to avoid rewiring this room as it has a flat steel roof so there's no space in the ceiling.

    John
     
    John Harnett, Feb 5, 2005
    #6
  7. Duncan

    Duncan

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Salinas de Garci Mendoza, Bolivia
    Hi John,

    It does sound like the unit is faulty.. contact Technical Support on 1300 722 247 and they will arrange for you to return it and a changeover unit provided.
     
    Duncan, Feb 5, 2005
    #7
  8. Duncan

    John Harnett

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Ah, but there's the rub, which unit ;-( As the gateway has trouble seeing any of the units is it the gateway, or is one of the other units causing the problem? Could do with an RF sniffer to see whats going on. Can the gateway relay from the wireless side for troubleshooting? This might also show up any external RF problems. There's 2 plug relay units, 2 dimmer units and the wall plate, the only common item is the gateway (and the so-so performance of the remote). Its harder to turn off the wall plaate for testing as I'll have to take it out of the wall. I'll try that tommorrow and see if it helps.

    John
     
    John Harnett, Feb 5, 2005
    #8
  9. Duncan

    John Harnett

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Melbourne
    More testing

    I've disconnected the wall plate unit, reset the 4 plug units and set them up in a group and added in the gateway. The gateway still fails to find most of the units and cannot communicate with any of the units well enough to get all of their details. It could be caused by external interference but given they are in one room, if that is the problem then wireless is never going to work (and the RF doorbell does). So I don't think it's that. The evidence would then point to the gateway unit being faulty so I'll chase up a replacement. Also, the toolkit does not seem to deal with this type of problem too well, it crashed frequently when attempting to talk to the units, leaving lock files behind which prevent it from accessing the network without a full restart.

    Thanks for the help.

    John
     
    John Harnett, Feb 6, 2005
    #9
  10. Duncan

    Duncan

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Salinas de Garci Mendoza, Bolivia
    Yes, we noticed this about a fortnight ago and its fixed for the next build. Will leave Ashleigh and others to comment on the wireless issues.
     
    Duncan, Feb 6, 2005
    #10
  11. Duncan

    ashleigh Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,397
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Need more info

    OK, so the gateway won't talk very well to the units.

    It *SOUNDS* like you have either got 1 faulty unit which is jabbering away like mad and upsetting the others, or you have some other source of RF interference close by.

    To try and isolate this:

    Start with two units only (two plug adaptors), can you make them into a network?

    If you can make them into a network, does that work Ok?

    Then link the remote on and check - does that work Ok or is it also very sluggish?

    Then add more units one at a time, check performance each time.

    This is a bit subjective - press buttons and look to see if you get either a long response time, or (worse) if the indicators all start flashing. The flash will run for 1 minute, and is telling you that a transmission failed due to too many retries. This indicates a heavily congested RF environment.

    Don't use the gateway (don't even power it up) when you do this test.

    Also ensure that only those other units you are using for the test are powered up when doing the test. If there is a faulty unit thats jabbering away, it can clag up the band even if its not in a network. Thats why its important to power them off when trying to isolate what the problem might be.


    IF you cannot get even two plug adaptors to network OK - set those 2 aside and try 2 more. If they won't work properly then it indicates you have a lot of other RF interference. In that case, not much anybody can do.

    On the other hand, if you find 2 that don't work well, and another 2 that do, then its a pointer to a suspicious one of the set of 2 that did not work OK.


    You need to proceed in a very slow, and systematic manner, or you will never get to the bottom of it.


    Looks like a troubleshooting guide might be a good thing to write and post :)


    If the units + remote won't operate reliably then changing the gateway won't make any difference.


    Also looks like we'd better express the release of some RF network test devices :)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 6, 2005
    ashleigh, Feb 6, 2005
    #11
  12. Duncan

    Frank Mc Alinden

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Seaford Melbourne
    Hi Guys
    Just a stab in the dark here ....John mentioned the room he has the cbus wireless kit in has a steel roof , would the steel roof have any effect on the rf signal ....?????

    Frank
     
    Frank Mc Alinden, Feb 6, 2005
    #12
  13. Duncan

    ashleigh Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,397
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Adelaide, South Australia
    It sure would. Steel is a lovely reflector (or, if trying to go from one side to another, it provides loads of isolation - as I've found out with wireless LAN in my house :mad: )

    Its possible that the room has numerous very deep multipath nulls. Moving units by about 7 to 10 cm in any direction should be enough to go from lousy performance to good.

    HOWEVER there is pretty close to nothing can be done to improve performance in a lousy RF environment.

    A simple experiment might tell a lot: grab an extension cord and a multi-outlet plug board, and take a few of the RF units outside - as far away from the house, and steel fences as possible. See what the performance is like then.
     
    ashleigh, Feb 6, 2005
    #13
  14. Duncan

    Bennett

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    While John is looking around the room, it would be well to consider what else is in the room or nearby. e.g. laptop, computer, burglar alarm components, radio remote controls. What else is in the room or nearby? It sounds like we are assuming the interference is always there? What other 'times' have the symptoms been checked? Radio problems can be frustrating to resolve and often require a look outside the obvious?
     
    Bennett, Feb 10, 2005
    #14
  15. Duncan

    Wonkey

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    418
    Likes Received:
    39
    Location:
    Adelaide
    This may be a stab in the dark but I have personally experienced, RF doorbells preventing RF security systems from operating.
    Which seems somewhat strange as you would only imagane that the door bell transmits when it is pressed. But on downpowering the doorbell system all worked great. Can't remember what make the door bell system was. Anyway down power the door bell and start from factory options of the C-bus wireless wall plates.
    If this proves to work it may be worth while phoning tech support and letting them know of the make and model of the door bell.
     
    Wonkey, Feb 10, 2005
    #15
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.