cbus calculator

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by GeorgeKosmas, May 1, 2006.

  1. GeorgeKosmas

    GeorgeKosmas

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Sydney
    does anyone know if there is some kind of cbus calculator for all the new cbus units? I have downloaded the cbus calculator from the cis website but it does not have most of the newer products in there.

    I heard something a long time ago that the calculator will be incorporated into the toolkit software.

    Please let me know.

    Thanks
     
    GeorgeKosmas, May 1, 2006
    #1
  2. GeorgeKosmas

    Duncan

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Salinas de Garci Mendoza, Bolivia
    Correct.. calculator is now built into Toolkit.. if you create a project. add your units. then click on the Network node you get a basic calculator result.
     
    Duncan, May 1, 2006
    #2
  3. GeorgeKosmas

    Charlie Crackle

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    815
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Cbus Calculator handy

    I usually use the old calculator just to get a rough idea of current consumption to see if a project needs to be split into 2.

    I could not do this the other day because the project was using DLT switches

    So I used toolkit. It took 10 times as long to put in the units and then I still got 9 units not calculated. ????? why are units not calculated and has anything be put in since version 1 to indicate which units are not in calculation. The old software was very handy and quick. Great for the shipping list as well. Would be handy to have the old software updated. Why does cbus cable have to have a unit address ?? it also does not warn you if you add 2000 meters of cable 5 Amps of power supplies or too may units. I tried this and got an impedance of 0ohms and a result of "Blank"

    Charles
     
    Charlie Crackle, May 1, 2006
    #3
  4. GeorgeKosmas

    PSC

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    For the first time I would have to agree with Charlie Crackle, I prefer the Cbus calculator as a stand-alone product as well.

    As Charlie indicated I'm sure that it is far quicker then using toolkit and it provides you instant feedback when adding new units regarding the power requirements.

    For those who already have a large number of Toolkit projects imagine adding every quotation in there as well??? :confused: You would have hundreds of projects to scroll through, I do not beleive this is (as the Super Nanny would say) asseptable.

    Come Duncan you man of leisure, put the J1 on hold for a day and update the CBus calculator :)
     
    PSC, May 1, 2006
    #4
  5. GeorgeKosmas

    Duncan

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Salinas de Garci Mendoza, Bolivia
    Hahaha :)

    Anyhow.. your feedback has been heard and I can see your point.. will discuss internally and work out how we can either make the Toolkit one a little easier to use informally or whether we need a little stand-alone tool like the old one.. as much as I'd like to update the old one, its just not feasible at this point..
     
    Duncan, May 1, 2006
    #5
  6. GeorgeKosmas

    GeorgeKosmas

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Sydney
    i have just tried to use the toolkit calculator and just like Charlie Crackle i had 10 units not calculated and since that this is a 32 unit network it is giving me an incorrect result.

    Does anyone know a way to fix this?

    Why are the units "Not calculated"?

    Regards
    George
     
    GeorgeKosmas, May 3, 2006
    #6
  7. GeorgeKosmas

    Richo

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide
    All your units in your project must have the correct catelogue number allocated to be used in the calculation.

    To allocate the catelogue number open the unit GUI and enter the catelogue number in the appropriate data field. If you have a barcode scanner you can scan the barcode of the box to enter the catelogue number (press F10 to open the scanning dialog)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2006
    Richo, May 3, 2006
    #7
  8. GeorgeKosmas

    marka

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    i agree, it was much better as a stand alone calculator
    it was good to sort out a job first,usually before i even buy the c-bus gear
    we dont us the barcode at all,just program at workshop and make any changes on site
    please bring back a current stand along calculator
     
    marka, May 3, 2006
    #8
  9. GeorgeKosmas

    Richo

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide
    This is currently being considered.
     
    Richo, May 3, 2006
    #9
  10. GeorgeKosmas

    PSC

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    I think it needs to be considered a little harder...
     
    PSC, May 3, 2006
    #10
  11. GeorgeKosmas

    BSS

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    I agree with PSC. If you need any help considering, why not post a poll regarding this matter. I use the stand alone calculator on all of my jobs. Surely it can't be too hard to include all of the new units available in an update of the stand alone calculator software.
     
    BSS, May 3, 2006
    #11
  12. GeorgeKosmas

    Charlie Crackle

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    815
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    Melbourne

    In my case I added all units using the catalogue. I checked and all units have a catalogue number. There is no way to find out which units are not calculating (ie have a catalogue number the software can not look up) Still 9 units not calculating.

    Maybe the catalogue had the incorrect catalogue numbers on some items :) !!!

    Charles
     
    Charlie Crackle, May 3, 2006
    #12
  13. GeorgeKosmas

    Richo

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide
    Charlie can you send the project and explaination of the problem to tech support. Hopefully they can identify the issue and if necessary provide the information we need to resolve the problem.
     
    Richo, May 4, 2006
    #13
  14. GeorgeKosmas

    Richo

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide
    We have identified a problem in C-gate that is causing some units to not be calculated. I can't say when the fix will be made available, but we know this is an important feature.
     
    Richo, May 4, 2006
    #14
  15. GeorgeKosmas

    JohnC

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    554
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Sydney
    Hmmm, intersting thing that I've never really thought about much - I've always bypassed the whole thing and used M$ Excel... coz I could never make Calculator or Toolkit work properly for the preliminary planning work !

    I've never needed the feature because neither Calculator or Toolkit have a "easy" way of creating Quotes, Bill Of Materials lists, Project Planning and all the other documentation required for handover to clients. No way I want to enter everything about a job, just to do a quote for one !

    So, (like many others) I made up speadsheets that calculate everything, create my parts lists and quotes, and provide lists of what gets installed in what position (for providing the the installing electrician). At the same time, the spreadsheet calculates the network current, etc so I know how many power supplies are needed. Then I manually "fiddle" the Output Device quantities to make it all match.

    However I've never used this method for big projects with multiple networks etc... so my method is NOT completely flawless, nor is it really good enough even to use as a "prototype" system either.

    JC
     
    JohnC, May 5, 2006
    #15
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.